CASE NO. J-2026-635816

Hannah v. Her partner

🕊 Hon. Samuel Tanaka presiding · Filed June 13, 2026

The dispute

He has not initiated physical affection in eight months and says everything is fine.

Plaintiff's argument
I have counted. The last time he reached for my hand first was a Saturday in October. I have brought it up three times. Each time he says nothing is wrong, that he loves me, that I am imagining the gap. We hug because I initiate. We kiss goodnight because I lean in. I do not know what to call this without making it bigger than he is willing to let it be.
Defendant's argument
Work has been hard. I am tired. I am not pulling away on purpose — I am just not in the same body I was a year ago. I love her. I show it in other ways. She is keeping a tally and turning it into a verdict.
VERDICT
In favor of Hannah.

The Court rules for Hannah, because 'I love her' is not the same thing as reaching for her, and the defendant knows the difference.

The Court's reasoning

You are not being accused of cruelty. You are being accused of absence, and you are responding to that accusation with a resume of your intentions. That is not a defense. Hannah is not keeping a tally to punish you — she is keeping a tally because it is the only way she can hold onto evidence that something real is happening. When someone has to count to prove they are not imagining their own loneliness, the partner who says 'nothing is wrong' is not comforting them. He is gaslighting them, however gently, however unintentionally.

Findings of the court
  1. I.I. The defendant does not dispute the eight months. He disputes its meaning. The Court finds the meaning is not in dispute.
  2. II.II. 'I show love in other ways' is a statement about the defendant's preferences, not Hannah's experience. These are not the same thing.
  3. III.III. Hannah has raised this three times. The defendant has responded with reassurance rather than change. Reassurance without change is its own kind of withdrawal.
  4. IV.IV. Plaintiff, notice that the anger is not about the hand-holding. The anger is about not being believed when you said you were hurting.
  5. V.V. The defendant is tired and disconnected from his own body. The Court accepts this as true. It does not excuse the dismissal.
Awarded “damages”
To the Plaintiff:
For the next seven mornings, the defendant initiates one small physical contact before either of you speaks about the day — a hand on her shoulder, a forehead touch, anything that requires him to cross the distance first. He does not announce it. He does not explain it. He simply does it. Then he sits with how unfamiliar that feels, and he does not look away from that feeling.

So ordered, this 13th day of June, 2026.

Hon. Samuel Tanaka

Court of AI

For entertainment only · Not legal advice · Not a real court

𝕏 Share on X✉ Send to someone📥 Download as image